Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
321-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

321-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018921 50.866677)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018822 50.866666,-1.018827 50.866686,-1.018840 50.866703,-1.018862 50.866717,-1.018890 50.866727,-1.018920 50.866730,-1.018951 50.866727,-1.018979 50.866718,-1.019001 50.866705,-1.019016 50.866687,-1.019021 50.866668,-1.019017 50.866648,-1.019003 50.866631,-1.018981 50.866617,-1.018954 50.866607,-1.018923 50.866604,-1.018892 50.866607,-1.018864 50.866616,-1.018842 50.866629,-1.018827 50.866647,-1.018822 50.866666)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL